🇦🇺再战光圈澳洲不删档公测——BGPlayer版

1、写在前面：应某人的要求狠狠的再写（水）一篇测评，本人都不知道本次产品线和上次的有啥不一样（买就完事了）。

2、买：本次机型：MEL-BGP-Essential1G/1C/16G SSD/2T 双向。V6不像其他商家一样给/64，是112。由于本家没有aff，所以跪求各位老爷看看我的aff
3、性能：光圈一贯的，个人向产品的性能一般般。

 -> System Information
 
 OS Release:        Debian GNU/Linux "Sid (Testing)" 11.3 (x86_64)
 CPU Model:        Intel Core Processor (Broadwell, IBRS)  2.40 GHz
 CPU Cache Size:    16384 KB
 CPU Number:        1 vCPU
 Virt Type:        KVM
 Memory Usage:        177.94 MB / 943.01 MB
 Swap Usage:        [ No Swapfile / Swap partition ]
 Disk Usage:        1.81 GB / 16.49 GB
 Boot Device:        /dev/vda1
 Load (1/5/15min):    3.95 1.06 0.36 
 CPU Usage:        0.0% used, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% steal
 Kernel Version:    5.10.0-10-amd64
 Network CC Method:    bbr + cake

 -> CPU Performance Test (Standard Mode, 3-Pass @ 30sec)

 1 Thread Test:            835 Scores

 -> Memory Performance Test (Standard Mode, 3-Pass @ 30sec)

 1 Thread - Read Test :        18172.38 MB/s
 1 Thread - Write Test:        13622.00 MB/s

 -> Disk Speed Test (4K Block/1M Block, Direct-Write)

 Test Name        Write Speed                Read Speed
 10MB-4K Block        48.6 MB/s (0.08 IOPS, 0.22 s)        55.3 MB/s (13512 IOPS, 0.19 s)
 10MB-1M Block        801 MB/s (763 IOPS, 0.01 s)        1.3 GB/s (1207 IOPS, 0.01 s)
 100MB-4K Block        54.6 MB/s (0.08 IOPS, 1.92 s)        74.1 MB/s (18095 IOPS, 1.41 s)
 100MB-1M Block        890 MB/s (848 IOPS, 0.12 s)        1.7 GB/s (1658 IOPS, 0.06 s)
 1GB-4K Block        55.2 MB/s (0.07 IOPS, 18.99 s)        67.2 MB/s (16413 IOPS, 15.60 s)
 1GB-1M Block        599 MB/s (571 IOPS, 1.75 s)        1.6 GB/s (1564 IOPS, 0.64 s)

4、网速：倒是G口

 -> Speedtest.net Network Speed Test

 Node Name            Upload Speed    Download Speed    Ping Latency
 Speedtest Default        120.11 MB/s    112.38 MB/s    0.39 ms
 China, Jilin CU        Fail: Unknown Error
 China, Shandong CU        Fail: Unknown Error
 China, Nanjing CU        29.86 MB/s    6.57 MB/s    306.35 ms
 China, Shanghai CU        56.52 MB/s    69.19 MB/s    373.77 ms
 China, Lanzhou CU        Fail: Unknown Error
 China, Beijing CT        Fail: Unknown Error
 China, Hangzhou CT        Fail: Unknown Error
 China, Nanjing CT        20.11 MB/s    38.19 MB/s    453.00 ms
 China, Guangzhou CT        6.26 MB/s    4.97 MB/s    473.82 ms
 China, Wuhan CT        0.97 MB/s    3.83 MB/s    477.05 ms
 China, Shenyang CM        Fail: Unknown Error
 China, Hangzhou CM        Fail: Unknown Error
 China, Nanning CM        Fail: Unknown Error
 China, Lanzhou CM        Fail: Unknown Error
 Hong Kong, HGC        86.94 MB/s    98.95 MB/s    124.04 ms
 Hong Kong, CSL        89.46 MB/s    74.57 MB/s    124.09 ms
 Hong Kong, PCCW        86.33 MB/s    74.13 MB/s    123.92 ms
 Korea, SK [Kdatacenter]        38.72 MB/s    75.20 MB/s    267.37 ms
 Japan, NTT [fdcservers]        123.23 MB/s    102.24 MB/s    112.21 ms
 Japan, NTT [i3d]        90.91 MB/s    91.79 MB/s    112.25 ms
 Japan GLBB        62.21 MB/s    102.22 MB/s    137.61 ms
 Japan Rakuten        131.57 MB/s    96.18 MB/s    191.92 ms
 Taiwan, Seednet        Fail: Unknown Error
 Taiwan, HiNet        1.75 MB/s    0.76 MB/s    138.16 ms
 Taiwan, TFN        Fail: Unknown Error
 Singapore, Singtel        119.93 MB/s    113.61 MB/s    81.88 ms
 Singapore, M1        127.24 MB/s    110.30 MB/s    82.71 ms
 Singapore, NME        Fail: Unknown Error
 United States, Century Link        121.93 MB/s    95.71 MB/s    184.36 ms
 United States, Verizon        Fail: Unknown Error

5、路由：之前说错了，上游应该是super loop。还有对香港光圈网络的特殊优化？
route

 -> Traceroute Test (IPV4)


Traceroute to China, Beijing CU (TCP Mode, Max 50 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 123.125.99.1 (123.125.99.1), 50 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  103.181.45.1  0.61 ms  AS38008  Australia, Victoria, Melbourne, aper.net.au
 2  *
 3  103.200.13.76  159.90 ms  *  Australia, superloop.com
 4  103.200.13.81  160.01 ms  *  Australia, superloop.com
 5  103.200.13.112  160.73 ms  *  Australia, New South Wales, Sydney, superloop.com
 6  111.118.196.23  161.70 ms  *  New Zealand, Auckland, superloop.com
 7  111.118.196.29  161.76 ms  *  New Zealand, superloop.com
 8  111.118.196.27  160.95 ms  *  United States, California, Los Angeles, superloop.com
 9  64.124.204.201  161.22 ms  AS6461  United States, California, Los Angeles, zayo.com
10  *
11  64.125.28.231  160.61 ms  AS6461  United States, California, Los Angeles, zayo.com
12  64.125.14.186  351.04 ms  AS6461  United States, California, Los Angeles, zayo.com
13  219.158.96.29  369.18 ms  AS4837  China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, ChinaUnicom
14  219.158.115.157  382.89 ms  AS4837  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
15  219.158.9.214  400.73 ms  AS4837  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
16  *
17  *
18  219.232.11.210  386.08 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
19  124.65.194.46  388.65 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
20  61.135.113.158  392.31 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom
21  *
22  123.125.99.1  394.09 ms  AS4808  China, Beijing, ChinaUnicom


Traceroute to China, Beijing CT (TCP Mode, Max 50 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 180.149.128.1 (180.149.128.1), 50 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  103.181.45.1  0.30 ms  AS38008  Australia, Victoria, Melbourne, aper.net.au
 2  *
 3  103.200.13.76  217.72 ms  *  Australia, superloop.com
 4  103.200.13.117  217.81 ms  *  Australia, superloop.com
 5  103.200.13.121  217.65 ms  *  Australia, superloop.com
 6  202.177.40.20  218.09 ms  *  Singapore, superloop.com
 7  202.130.207.32  217.69 ms  *  Australia, superloop.com
 8  195.66.225.54  238.99 ms  AS8553  United Kingdom, London, linx.net
 9  *
10  *
11  *
12  *
13  *
14  *
15  *
16  *
17  *
18  180.149.128.1  419.35 ms  AS23724  China, Beijing, ChinaTelecom


Traceroute to China, Beijing CM (TCP Mode, Max 50 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 211.136.25.153 (211.136.25.153), 50 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  103.181.45.1  0.46 ms  AS38008  Australia, Victoria, Melbourne, aper.net.au
 2  *
 3  103.200.13.76  112.45 ms  *  Australia, superloop.com
 4  103.200.13.110  112.55 ms  *  Australia, New South Wales, Sydney, superloop.com
 5  103.200.13.199  112.50 ms  *  Japan, Tokyo, superloop.com
 6  63.216.242.213  112.44 ms  AS3491,AS31713  Japan, Tokyo, pccw.com
 7  63.218.250.153  112.46 ms  AS3491,AS31713  Japan, Tokyo, pccw.com
 8  *
 9  223.120.2.245  138.46 ms  AS58453  Japan, Tokyo, ChinaMobile
10  *
11  *
12  *
13  *
14  *
15  111.24.17.158  317.28 ms  AS9808  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
16  111.24.14.46  297.20 ms  AS9808  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
17  211.136.67.106  287.55 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
18  211.136.67.166  297.79 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
19  211.136.67.166  312.79 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
20  211.136.95.226  289.44 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile
21  *
22  211.136.25.153  306.11 ms  AS56048  China, Beijing, ChinaMobile

 -> Traceroute Test (IPV6)

Traceroute to China, Beijing CU IPV6 (ICMP Mode, Max 50 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 2408:80f0:4100:20053), 50 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  2400:58a0:101::1  0.47 ms  sign failed
 2  *
 3  2001:470:0:62b::1  17.80 ms  sign failed
 4  2001:470:0:51c::1  165.25 ms  sign failed
 5  2001:470:0:4cb::1  164.67 ms  sign failed
 6  2001:470:0:535::2  164.98 ms  sign failed
 7  2001:470:0:1eb::2  182.28 ms  sign failed
 8  2408:8000:2:6f4::  337.93 ms  sign failed
 9  2408:8000:2:668::  354.71 ms  sign failed
10  *
11  2408:8000:2:38e::  332.32 ms  sign failed
12  2408:8000:1100:3d1::3  355.70 ms  sign failed
13  2408:8000:1100:1901::3  343.25 ms  sign failed
14  2408:8000:1f10:3d00::3  329.98 ms  sign failed
15  2408:80f0:4100:2006::1  350.64 ms  sign failed
16  2408:80f0:4100:2006::b  363.75 ms  sign failed
17  *
18  *
19  *
20  *
21  *
22  *
23  *
24  *
25  *
26  *
27  *
28  *
29  *
30  *
31  *
32  *
33  *
34  *
35  *
36  *
37  *
38  *
39  *
40  *
41  *
42  *
43  *
44  *
45  *
46  *
47  *
48  *
49  *
50  *

Traceroute to China, Beijing CT IPV6 (ICMP Mode, Max 50 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 2400:da00:229), 50 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  2400:58a0:101::1  32.20 ms  sign failed
 2  *
 3  2001:470:0:62b::1  30.78 ms  sign failed
 4  2001:470:0:4f2::2  12.36 ms  sign failed
 5  2001:470:0:4ef::2  57.21 ms  sign failed
 6  2001:470:0:4ee::1  108.03 ms  sign failed
 7  *
 8  *
 9  2001:7fa:0:1::ca28:a1be  170.97 ms  sign failed
10  2001:252:0:106::1  170.43 ms  sign failed
11  2001:252:0:100::1  171.86 ms  sign failed
12  2001:252:0:1::1  171.33 ms  sign failed
13  2001:da8:2:801::2  170.85 ms  sign failed
14  2400:a980:ff:76::2  171.11 ms  sign failed
15  *
16  240c:4001::182:61:255:30  251.96 ms  sign failed
17  *
18  *
19  *
20  *
21  *
22  *
23  *
24  *
25  *
26  *
27  *
28  *
29  *
30  *
31  *
32  *
33  *
34  *
35  *
36  *
37  *
38  *
39  *
40  *
41  *
42  *
43  *
44  *
45  *
46  *
47  *
48  *
49  *
50  *

Traceroute to China, Beijing CM IPV6 (ICMP Mode, Max 50 Hop)
============================================================
traceroute to 2409:8089:1020:50ff:1000fd01), 50 hops max, 32 byte packets
 1  2400:58a0:101::1  0.58 ms  sign failed
 2  *
 3  2001:470:0:62b::1  15.05 ms  sign failed
 4  2001:470:0:51c::1  165.54 ms  sign failed
 5  2001:470:0:4cb::1  164.61 ms  sign failed
 6  2001:470:0:1b1::2  164.80 ms  sign failed
 7  *
 8  *
 9  *
10  *
11  2409:8080:0:1:2c1:2f1:3:0  281.63 ms  sign failed
12  *
13  2409:8080:1:2:203:203:1:0  280.78 ms  sign failed
14  *
15  2409:8080:1:2:103:103:2:1  315.25 ms  sign failed
16  2409:8080:0:2:103:1b1:0:1  305.88 ms  sign failed
17  2409:8089:1020:50ff:1000::fd01  305.81 ms  sign failed